Home

Monday, June 23, 2014

Long-Term Outcomes of Kidney Transplantation Across a Positive Complement-Dependent Cytotoxicity Crossmatch

Transplantation - Current Issue Long-Term Outcomes of Kidney Transplantation Across a Positive Complement-Dependent Cytotoxicity Crossmatch

imageBackgroundMore than 30% of potential kidney transplant recipients have pre-existing anti–human leukocyte antigen antibodies. This subgroup has significantly lower transplant rates and increased mortality. Desensitization has become an important tool to overcome this immunological barrier. However, limited data is available regarding long-term outcomes, in particular for the highest risk group with a positive complement-dependent cytotoxicity crossmatch (CDC XM) before desensitization. MethodsBetween 2002 and 2010, 39 patients underwent living-kidney transplantation across a positive CDC XM against their donors at our center. The desensitization protocol involved pretransplant immunosuppression, plasmapheresis, and low-dose intravenous immunoglobulin±rituximab. Measured outcomes included patient survival, graft survival, renal function, rates of rejection, infection, and malignancy. ResultsThe mean and median follow-up was 5.2 years. Patient survival was 95% at 1 year, 95% at 3 years, and 86% at 5 years. Death-censored graft survival was 94% at 1 year, 88% at 3 years, and 84% at 5 years. Uncensored graft survival was 87% at 1 year, 79% at 3 years, and 72% at 5 years. Twenty-four subjects (61%) developed acute antibody-mediated rejection of the allograft and one patient lost her graft because of hyperacute rejection. Infectious complications included pneumonia (17%), BK nephropathy (10%), and CMV disease (5%). Skin cancer was the most prevalent malignancy in 10% of patients. There were no cases of lymphoproliferative disorder. Mean serum creatinine was 1.7±1 mg/dL in functioning grafts at 5 years after transplantation. ConclusionDespite high rates of early rejection, desensitization in living-kidney transplantation results in acceptable 5-year patient and graft survival rates.


http://journals.lww.com/transplantjournal/Fulltext/2014/06270/Long_Term_Outcomes_of_Kidney_Transplantation.10.aspx

Sent with Reeder



Enviado desde mi iPad

Optimal Immunosuppression for HIV-Positive Kidney Transplants: Long-Term Randomized Controlled Trials Needed



Enviado desde mi iPad

A Randomized, Prospective, Parallel Group Study of Laparoscopic Versus Laparoendoscopic Single Site Donor Nephrectomy for Kidney Donation

AJT - Early A Randomized, Prospective, Parallel Group Study of Laparoscopic Versus Laparoendoscopic Single Site Donor Nephrectomy for Kidney Donation

Few prospective, randomized studies have assessed the benefits of laparoendoscopic single site donor nephrectomy (LESS-DN) over laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (LDN). Our center initiated such a trial in January 2011, following subjects randomized to LESS-DN versus LDN from surgery through 5 years postdonation. Subjects complete recovery/satisfaction questionnaires at 2, 6 and 12 months postdonation; transplant recipient outcomes are also recorded. One hundred subjects (49 LESS-DN, 51 LDN) underwent surgery; donor demographics were similar between groups, and included a predominance of female, living-unrelated donors, mean age of 47 years who underwent left donor nephrectomy. Operative parameters (overall time, time to extraction, warm ischemia time, blood loss) were similar between groups. Conversion to hand-assist laparoscopy was required in 3 LESS-DN (6.1%) versus 2 LDN (3.9%; p = 0.67). Questionnaires revealed that 97.2% of LESS-DN versus 79.5% of LDN (p = 0.03) were 100% recovered by 2 months after donation. No significant difference was seen in satisfaction scores between the groups. Recipient outcomes were similar between groups. Our randomized trial comparing LESS donor nephrectomy to LDN confirms that LESS-DN offers a safe alternative to conventional LDN in terms of intra- and post-operative complications. LDN and LESS-DN offer similar recovery and satisfaction after donation.




http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fajt.12735

Sent with Reeder



Enviado desde mi iPad

Friday, June 20, 2014

A Randomized, Prospective, Parallel Group Study of Laparoscopic Versus Laparoendoscopic Single Site Donor Nephrectomy for Kidney Donation.

AJT A Randomized, Prospective, Parallel Group Study of Laparoscopic Versus Laparoendoscopic Single Site Donor Nephrectomy for Kidney Donation.

Few prospective, randomized studies have assessed the benefits of laparoendoscopic single site donor nephrectomy (LESS-DN) over laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (LDN). Our center initiated such a trial in January 2011, following subjects randomized to LESS-DN versus LDN from surgery through 5 years postdonation. Subjects complete recovery/satisfaction questionnaires at 2, 6 and 12 months postdonation; transplant recipient outcomes are also recorded. One hundred subjects (49 LESS-DN, 51 LDN) underwent surgery; donor demographics were similar between groups, and included a predominance of female, living-unrelated donors, mean age of 47 years who underwent left donor nephrectomy. Operative parameters (overall time, time to extraction, warm ischemia time, blood loss) were similar between groups. Conversion to hand-assist laparoscopy was required in 3 LESS-DN (6.1%) versus 2 LDN (3.9%; p = 0.67). Questionnaires revealed that 97.2% of LESS-DN versus 79.5% of LDN (p = 0.03) were 100% recovered by 2 months after donation. No significant difference was seen in satisfaction scores between the groups. Recipient outcomes were similar between groups. Our randomized trial comparing LESS donor nephrectomy to LDN confirms that LESS-DN offers a safe alternative to conventional LDN in terms of intra- and post-operative complications. LDN and LESS-DN offer similar recovery and satisfaction after donation.



http://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/24934732/A_Randomized_Prospective_Parallel_Group_Study_of_Laparoscopic_Versus_Laparoendoscopic_Single_Site_Donor_Nephrectomy_for_Kidney_Donation_

Sent with Reeder



Enviado desde mi iPhone

Wednesday, June 4, 2014

The risk of thromboembolic events in kidney transplant patients

Kidney International - Issue - nature.com science feeds The risk of thromboembolic events in kidney transplant patients

The risk of thromboembolic events in kidney transplant patients

Kidney International 85, 1454 (June 2014). doi:10.1038/ki.2013.536

Authors: Jacobien C Verhave, Vicky Tagalakis, Samy Suissa, François Madore, Marie-Josée Hébert & Héloïse Cardinal




http://feeds.nature.com/~r/ki/rss/current/~3/QjiBNtJw5bs/ki.2013.536

Sent with Reeder



Enviado desde mi iPad

Phospholipase A2 Receptor Autoantibodies and Clinical Outcome in Patients with Primary Membranous Nephropathy

Journal of the American Society of Nephrology current issue Phospholipase A2 Receptor Autoantibodies and Clinical Outcome in Patients with Primary Membranous Nephropathy

Membranous nephropathy (MN) is the most common cause of nephrotic syndrome in adults, with an uncertain clinical outcome. The characterization of the phospholipase A2 receptor (PLA2R) as the major target antigen in primary MN and the detection of circulating autoantibodies in these patients is a major advance in understanding this disease. To test whether PLA2R antibody levels reflect disease activity or clinical outcome, we performed a prospective multicenter study of 133 adult patients with primary MN and detectable serum PLA2R antibodies who had not received immunosuppressive therapy. Patients were followed ≤24 months. PLA2R antibody levels associated with clinical disease activity (proteinuria) in patients with immunosuppressive therapy (n=101) or supportive care (n=32). Within 3 months, immunosuppressive therapy led to a sustained 81% reduction in PLA2R antibody levels paralleled by a 39% reduction in proteinuria. Patients who experienced remission of proteinuria after 12 months had significantly lower PLA2R antibody levels at the time of study inclusion compared with patients with no remission. Patients with high PLA2R antibody levels achieved remission of proteinuria significantly later than patients with low PLA2R antibody levels. PLA2R antibody levels fell over time in patients with spontaneous remission but remained elevated in patients who did not show a reduction in proteinuria. Multivariable Cox regression analysis confirmed PLA2R antibody level as an independent risk factor for not achieving remission of proteinuria. We conclude that a decrease in PLA2R antibody level is associated with a decrease of proteinuria in patients with primary MN.




http://jasn.asnjournals.org/cgi/content/short/25/6/1357?rss=1

Sent with Reeder



Enviado desde mi iPad