Alberto Reino Buelvas
RECENT ARTICLES FROM THE MEDICAL LITERATURE IN KIDNEY TRANSPLANT. Shared by Dr. Alberto Reino Buelvas
Monday, January 25, 2016
Thursday, January 14, 2016
Recurrent Membranous Nephropathy After Kidney Transplantation: Treatment and Long-Term Implications.
http://pdfs.journals.lww.com/transplantjournal/9000/00000/Recurrent_Membranous_Nephropathy_After_Kidney.97556.pdf
Sent with Reeder
Alberto Reino Buelvas
Effect of twice-yearly denosumab on prevention of bone mineral density loss in de novo kidney transplant recipients: a randomized controlled trial
Abstract
We conducted an open-label, prospective, randomized trial to assess the efficacy and safety of RANKL inhibition with denosumab to prevent the loss of BMD in the first year after kidney transplantation. Ninety kidney transplant recipients were randomized 1:1 two weeks after surgery to receive denosumab (60 mg at baseline and 6 months) or no treatment. After 12 months, total lumbar spine aBMD increased by 4.6% (95% CI 3.3-5.9%) in 46 patients in the denosumab group and decreased by -0.5% (95% CI -1.8-0.9%) in 44 patients in the control group (between-group difference 5.1% (95% CI 3.1-7.0%), P<0.0001). Denosumab also increased aBMD at the total hip by 1.9% (95% CI, 0.1 to 3.7%; P=0.035) over that in the control group at 12 months. HR-pQCT in a subgroup of 24 patients showed that denosumab increased vBMD at the distal tibia and radius (all P<0.05). Biomarkers of bone turnover (β-CTX, P1NP) markedly decreased with denosumab (all P<0.0001). Episodes of cystitis and asymptomatic hypocalcemia occurred more often with denosumab, whereas graft function, rate of rejections and incidence of opportunistic infections were similar. In conclusion, denosumab increased BMD in the first year after kidney transplantation but was associated with more frequent episodes of urinary tract infection.
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fajt.13692
Sent with Reeder
Alberto Reino Buelvas
Monday, December 28, 2015
Fewer cytomegalovirus complications after kidney transplantation by de novo use of mTOR inhibitors in comparison to mycophenolic acid
Abstract
Background
Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is a risk factor for patient and graft survival after kidney transplantation.
Methods
We retrospectively analyzed risk factors for CMV infection in 348 patients who received a kidney transplant donated after brain death (n = 232) or by living donation (n = 116) between 2008 and 2013. Of the 348 patients analyzed 91 received a mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor (mTORi)- based immunosuppressive regimen. A total of 266 patients were treated with standard immunosuppression (Group 1) consisting of basiliximab induction, calcineurin inhibitor (CNI), and either mycophenolic acid (MPA, n = 219) or everolimus (EVE) (n = 47). We also included 82 patients received more intense immunosuppression (Group 2) with lymphocyte depletion, CNI, plus either MPA (n = 38) or EVE (n = 44). Only patients in the high-risk constellation received CMV prophylaxis in Group 1, while all patients in Group 2 received prophylaxis for 6 month.
Results
The overall rate of CMV infections was low with 10.1% in all patients. Despite the different prophylaxis strategies applied, no difference was seen in CMV infections between Group 1 (10.9%) and Group 2 (13.6%). A multivariate analysis revealed that patients on EVE had fewer CMV complications compared with patients on MPA (P = 0.013, odds ratio [OR] 4.8, confidence interval [CI] 1.4–16.5). Donor and recipient age > 65 years was an independent risk factor (P = 0.002, OR 3.2, CI 1.5–6.7) for CMV infections. Patients with CMV infections had significantly worse graft function after 2 years (P = 0.001).
Conclusion
CMV is a significant risk factor for long-term graft outcome. Patients treated with EVE developed fewer CMV complications compared to patients on MPA. The use of mTORi is useful in patients at high risk of developing CMV infections.
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Ftid.12494
Sent with Reeder
Alberto Reino Buelvas
Thursday, December 17, 2015
Influence of Current and Previous Smoking on Cancer and Mortality After Kidney Transplantation [feedly]
http://journals.lww.com/transplantjournal/Fulltext/2016/01000/Influence_of_Current_and_Previous_Smoking_on.34.aspx
-- via my feedly.com reader
Saturday, November 14, 2015
Efficacy and safety of tacrolimus compared with ciclosporin a in renal transplantation: seven-year observational results
Abstract
Background
The European Tacrolimus vs. Ciclosporin-A Microemulsion (CsA-ME) Renal Transplantation Study demonstrated that tacrolimus decreased acute rejection rates at 6 months.
Methods
Primary endpoints of this investigator-initiated, observational 7-year follow-up study were acute rejection rates, patient and graft survival rates, and a composite endpoint (BPAR, graft loss, patient death). We analyzed data from the original ITT population (n=557; 286 tacrolimus, 271 CsA-ME).
Results
237 tacrolimus and 208 CsA-ME patients provided data. At 7 years, Kaplan-Meier estimated rates of patients free from BPAR were 77.1% in the tacrolimus arm and 59.9% in the CsA-ME arm, graft survival rates amounted to 82.6% and 80.6%, and patient survival rates to 89.9% and 88.1%. Estimated combined endpoint-free survival rates were 60.2% in the tacrolimus arm and 47.0% in the CsA-ME arm (p=<0.0001).
A higher number of patients from the CsA-ME arm crossed over to tacrolimus during 7 year follow-up: 19.7% vs. 7.9% (p=<0.002). More patients in the tacrolimus group stopped steroids and received immunosuppressive monotherapy. Significantly more CsA-ME patients received lipid-lowering medication, experienced cosmetic and cardiovascular adverse events.
Conclusions
Tacrolimus-treated renal transplant recipients had significantly higher combined endpoint-free survival rates mainly driven by lower acute rejection rates despite less immunosuppressive medication at 7 years.
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Ftri.12716
Sent with Reeder
Alberto Reino Buelvas