Improved Renal Function After Early Conversion From a Calcineurin Inhibitor to Everolimus: a Randomized Trial in Kidney Transplantation

Improved Renal Function After Early Conversion From a Calcineurin Inhibitor to Everolimus: a Randomized Trial in Kidney Transplantation

In an open-label, multicenter trial, de novo kidney transplant recipients at low to medium immunological risk were randomized at week 7 posttransplant to remain on CsA (n = 100, controls) or convert to everolimus (n = 102), both with enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium and corticosteroids. The primary endpoint, change in measured GFR (mGFR) from week 7 to month 12, was significantly greater with everolimus than controls: 4.9 (11.8) mL/min versus 0.0 (12.9) mL/min (p = 0.012; analysis of covariance [ANCOVA]). Per protocol analysis demonstrated a more marked difference: an increase of 8.7 (11.2) mL/min with everolimus versus a decrease of 0.4 (12.0) mL/min in controls (p < 0.001; ANCOVA). There were no differences in graft or patient survival. The 12-month incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) was 27.5% (n = 28) with everolimus and 11.0% (n = 11) in controls (p = 0.004). All but two episodes of BPAR in each group were mild. Adverse events occurred in 95.1% of everolimus patients and 90.0% controls (p = 0.19), with serious adverse events in 53.9% and 38.0%, respectively (p = 0.025). Discontinuation because of adverse events was more frequent with everolimus (25.5%) than controls (3.0%; p = 0.030). In conclusion, conversion from CsA to everolimus at week 7 after kidney transplantation was associated with a greater improvement in mGFR at month 12 versus CNI-treated controls but discontinuations and BPAR were more frequent.

Early conversion to a sirolimus-based, calcineurin-inhibitor-free immunosuppression in the SMART trial: observational results at 24 and 36 months after transplantation

Early conversion to a sirolimus-based, calcineurin-inhibitor-free immunosuppression in the SMART trial: observational results at 24 and 36 months after transplantation:

Summary

Early conversion to a calcineurin-inhibitor (CNI)-free maintenance immunosuppression with sirolimus (SRL), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and steroids was associated with an improved 1-year renal function as compared with a cyclosporine (CsA)-based regimen (SMART core-study). This observational follow-up describes 132 patients followed up within the SMART study framework for 36 months. At 36 months, renal function continued to be superior in SRL-treated patients [ITT-eGFR_@36m: 60.88 vs. 53.72 (CsA) ml/min/1.73 m², P = 0.031].

A Randomized Trial With Steroids and Antithymocyte Globulins Comparing Cyclosporine/Azathioprine Versus Tacrolimus/Mycophenolate Mofetil (CATM2) in Renal Transplantation

A Randomized Trial With Steroids and Antithymocyte Globulins Comparing Cyclosporine/Azathioprine Versus Tacrolimus/Mycophenolate Mofetil (CATM2) in Renal Transplantation: Background: The best immunosuppressive regimen in benefit-risk ratio in renal transplantation is debated. Nowadays, tacrolimus (Tac) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) are considered more efficient than cyclosporine A (CsA) and MMF, but recent studies have challenged this assumption.
Methods: We conducted a monocentric, prospective, open-labeled, randomized, and controlled trial comparing CsA/azathioprine (Aza) versus Tac/MMF in 289 kidney transplant recipients treated with antithymocyte globulins and prednisone. Primary outcome was the number of patients with clinically suspected acute rejection at 1 year. Secondary outcomes were the number of patients with biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR), estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), patient and graft survivals, and adverse events at 1 and 3 years.

Immunosuppressant Regimen Based on Sirolimus Decreases Aortic Stiffness in Renal Transplant Recipients in Comparison to Cyclosporine.

Immunosuppressant Regimen Based on Sirolimus Decreases Aortic Stiffness in Renal Transplant Recipients in Comparison to Cyclosporine.: Joannidès R, Monteil C, de Ligny BH, et al.
Immunosuppressant Regimen Based on Sirolimus Decreases Aortic Stiffness in Renal Transplant Recipients in Comparison to Cyclosporine. [JOURNAL ARTICLE]
Am J Transplant 2011 Sep 19.

Whether or not a cyclosporine A (CsA)-free immunosuppressant regimen based on sirolimus (SRL) prevents aortic stiffening and improves central hemodynamics in renal recipients remains unknown. Forty-four patients (48 ± 2 years) enrolled in the CONCEPT trial were randomized at week 12 (W12) to continue CsA or switch to SRL, both associated with mycophenolate mofetil. Carotid systolic blood pressure (cSBP), pulse pressure (cPP), central pressure wave reflection (augmentation index, AIx) and carotid-to-femoral pulse-wave velocity (PWV: aortic stiffness) were blindly assessed at W12, W26 and W52 together with plasma endothelin-1 (ET-1), thiobarbituric acid-reactive substances (TBARS) and superoxide dismutase (SOD) and catalase erythrocyte activities. At W12, there was no difference between groups. At follow-up, PWV, cSBP, cPP and AIx were lower in the SRL group. The difference in PWV remained significant after adjustment for blood pressure and eGFR. In parallel, ET-1 decreased in the SRL group, while TBARS, SOD and catalase erythrocyte activities increased in both groups but to a lesser extent in the SRL group. Our results demonstrate that a CsA-free regimen based on SRL reduces aortic stiffness, plasma endothelin-1 and oxidative stress in renal recipients suggesting a protective effect on the arterial wall that may be translated into cardiovascular risk reduction.

Randomized Trial of Immunosuppressive Regimens in Renal Transplantation

Randomized Trial of Immunosuppressive Regimens in Renal Transplantation:
The optimal long-term regimen for immunosuppression for kidney transplant recipients is unknown. We conducted a randomized trial involving 150 kidney transplant recipients to compare tacrolimus/sirolimus, tacrolimus/mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), and cyclosporine/sirolimus. All patients received daclizumab induction and maintenance corticosteroids. Median follow-up was 8 yr post-transplant.